1. In a Fibre Channel network, a method of processing traffic in an arbitrated loop, comprising:
identifying a status of a fairness indicator associated with the arbitrated loop, wherein the fairness indicator is associated with an interface of a switch that is coupled to the arbitrated loop, the fairness indicator indicating that fairness is enabled when the fairness indicator is in a first state and indicating that fairness is disabled when the fairness indicator is in a second state;
enabling a requesting entity on the arbitrated loop to send an arbitration request when the fairness indicator is in the first state, the arbitration request forcing a transmitting entity that is transmitting frames on the arbitrated loop to relinquish control of the arbitrated loop; and
preventing an entity on the arbitrated loop from sending an arbitration request when the fairness indicator is in the second state.
2. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising:
setting the fairness indicator such that the fairness indicator is in the first state or the second state.
3. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the switch maintains a different fairness indicator for each one of a plurality of interfaces of the switch such that a requesting entity on a corresponding arbitrated loop coupled to one of the plurality of interfaces can send an arbitration request when the fairness indicator is in the first state, the arbitration request forcing a transmitting entity that is transmitting frames on the arbitrated loop to relinquish control of the arbitrated loop.
4. The method as recited in claim 3, wherein an entity on the corresponding arbitrated loop is prevented from sending an arbitration request when the fairness indicator of the one of the plurality of interfaces is in the second state.
5. A method of processing traffic in an arbitrated loop of a Fibre Channel network, comprising:
ascertaining whether a switch implementing network-based virtualization is coupled to the arbitrated loop;
when a switch implementing network-based virtualization is coupled to the arbitrated loop, setting a fairness indicator associated with the arbitrated loop, the fairness indicator indicating that fairness is enabled when the fairness indicator is in a first state and indicating that fairness is disabled when the fairness indicator is in a second state, wherein the fairness indicator is associated with an interface of the switch that is coupled to the arbitrated loop; and
when a switch implementing network-based virtualization is not coupled to the arbitrated loop, configuring a loop tenancy associated with the arbitrated loop.
6. The method as recited in claim 5, further comprising:
enabling a requesting entity on the arbitrated loop to send an arbitration request when the fairness indicator is in the first state, the arbitration request forcing a transmitting entity that is transmitting frames on the arbitrated loop to relinquish control of the arbitrated loop.
7. The method as recited in claim 5, wherein configuring a loop tenancy comprises:
ascertaining an average IO size associated with the arbitrated loop;
determining a number of simultaneous operations on the loop; and
configuring the loop tenancy such that it is directly proportional to the average IO size and inversely proportional to the number of simultaneous operations on the loop.
8. The method as recited in claim 5, further comprising:
setting the fairness indicator such that the fairness indicator is in the first state or the second state.
9. The method as recited in claim 5, wherein the switch maintains a different fairness indicator for each interface of the switch.
10. The method as recited in claim 5, further comprising:
preventing an entity on the arbitrated loop from sending an arbitration request when the fairness indicator is in the second state.
11. A switch configured to process traffic in an arbitrated loop of a Fibre Channel network, the switch having a plurality of interfaces, comprising:
a processor;
a memory; and
a data structure or register, the data structure or register including a fairness indicator associated with each of the plurality of interfaces of the switch, the fairness indicator indicating that fairness is enabled for the corresponding interface when the fairness indicator is in a first state and indicating that fairness is disabled for the corresponding interface when the fairness indicator is in a second state;
wherein a requesting entity on an arbitrated loop coupled to one of the plurality of interfaces may send an arbitration request when the fairness indicator for the one of the plurality of interfaces coupled to the arbitrated loop is in the first state, the arbitration request forcing a transmitting entity that is transmitting frames on the arbitrated loop to relinquish control of the arbitrated loop.
12. The switch as recited in claim 11, wherein the network implements virtualization.
13. The switch as recited in claim 11, wherein the network is a storage area network.
14. The switch as recited in claim 11, wherein the requesting entity on the arbitrated loop is prevented from sending an arbitration request when the fairness indicator of the one of the plurality of interfaces is in the second state.
15. The switch as recited in claim 11, wherein the fairness indicator is in the first state when the corresponding interface implements network-based virtualization.
16. The switch as recited in claim 11, wherein the fairness indicator is in the first state if the switch implements network-based virtualization.
17. A computer-readable medium storing thereon computer-readable instructions for processing traffic in an arbitrated loop of a Fibre Channel network, comprising:
instructions for ascertaining whether a switch implementing network-based virtualization is coupled to the arbitrated loop, the switch having a plurality of interfaces;
instructions for setting a fairness indicator associated with the arbitrated loop when a switch implementing network-based virtualization is coupled to the arbitrated loop, the fairness indicator indicating that fairness is enabled when the fairness indicator is in a first state and indicating that fairness is disabled when the fairness indicator is in a second state, wherein the fairness indicator is associated with an interface of the switch that is coupled to the arbitrated loop; and
instructions for configuring a loop tenancy associated with the arbitrated loop when a switch implementing network-based virtualization is not coupled to the arbitrated loop.
18. The computer-readable medium as recited in claim 17, further comprising:
instructions for enabling a requesting entity on the arbitrated loop to send an arbitration request when the fairness indicator is in the first state, the arbitration request forcing a transmitting entity that is transmitting frames on the arbitrated loop to relinquish control of the arbitrated loop.
19. The computer-readable medium as recited in claim 17, wherein configuring a loop tenancy comprises:
ascertaining an average IO size associated with the arbitrated loop;
determining a number of simultaneous operations on the loop; and
configuring the loop tenancy such that it is directly proportional to the average IO size and inversely proportional to the number of simultaneous operations on the loop.
20. The computer-readable medium as recited in claim 17, further comprising:
instructions for setting the fairness indicator such that the fairness indicator is in the first state or the second state.
21. The computer-readable medium as recited in claim 17, wherein the switch maintains a different fairness indicator for each interface of the switch.
22. The computer-readable medium as recited in claim 17, further comprising:
instructions for preventing an entity on the arbitrated loop from sending an arbitration request when the fairness indicator is in the second state.
23. An apparatus for processing traffic in an arbitrated loop of a Fibre Channel network, comprising:
means for ascertaining whether a switch implementing network-based virtualization is coupled to the arbitrated loop, the switch having a plurality of interfaces;
means for setting a fairness indicator associated with the arbitrated loop when a switch implementing network-based virtualization is coupled to the arbitrated loop, the fairness indicator indicating that fairness is enabled when the fairness indicator is in a first state and indicating that fairness is disabled when the fairness indicator is in a second state, wherein the fairness indicator is associated with an interface of the switch that is coupled to the arbitrated loop; and
means for configuring a loop tenancy associated with the arbitrated loop when a switch implementing network-based virtualization is not coupled to the arbitrated loop.
The claims below are in addition to those above.
All refrences to claim(s) which appear below refer to the numbering after this setence.
1. A method for assessing mechanical properties of a selected tissue, the method comprising:
defining an expansion chamber adjacent to the selected tissue;
passing pressurized air into the expansion chamber; and
providing an opening through which the pressurized air can escape the expansion chamber, the opening being disposed such that, while escaping from the expansion chamber, air passes by the selected tissue, thereby causing the selected tissue to vibrate.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising selecting the selected tissue to be vocal fold tissue.
3. The method of claim 1, further comprising selecting the selected tissue to be skin.
4. The method of claim 1, further comprising measuring acoustic waves generated by the vibrating tissue.
5. The method of claim 1, further comprising illuminating the vibrating tissue with a stroboscope.
6. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining a fundamental vibration frequency of the selected tissue.
7. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining a phonation threshold pressure of the selected tissue.