1. An information analysis device comprising:
a related expression generation section that accepts an evaluation object expression as input, the evaluation object expression being an linguistic expression to be evaluated, and generates a linguistic expression related to the evaluation object expression as a related expression; and
a credibility calculation section that acquires the evaluation object expression and the related expression from a plurality of electronic documents along with time information and calculates credibility concerning the meaning of the evaluation object expression at a specific point in time by comparing the number of times that the acquired evaluation object expression appears that the acquired evaluation object expression appears and the number of times that the acquired related expression appears that the acquired related expression appears at the same time point.
2. The information analysis device according to claim 1, wherein
the credibility calculation section acquires the evaluation object expression and the related expression from a plurality of electronic documents along with time information and make adjustments to the credibility of the evaluation object expression at a specific point in time by comparing the trend of change in the number of times that the acquired evaluation object expression appears and the trend of change in the number of times that the acquired related expression appears at the same time point.
3. The information analysis device according to claim 2, wherein:
when an upward trend of the evaluation object expression and a downward trend of the related expression are observed at the same time point, the credibility calculation section raises the credibility of the evaluation object expression for a time when the upward trend of the evaluation object expression and the downward trend of the related expression are observed at the same time point or for a time point after the observed time; and
when a downward trend of the evaluation object expression and an upward trend of the related expression are observed at the same time point, the credibility calculation section decreases the credibility of the evaluation object expression for a time when the downward trend of the evaluation object expression and the upward trend of the related expression are observed at the same time point or for a time point after the observed time.
4. The information analysis device according to claim 1, wherein
the related expression generation section generates, as an related expression, an expression whose meaning is in conflict with the evaluation object expression.
5. The information analysis device according to claim 1, wherein
the related expression generation section generates, as a related expression, an expression that is in co-occurrence with the evaluation object expression by referring to the plurality of electronic documents.
6. The information analysis device according to claim 5, wherein
the credibility calculation section makes adjustments to the credibility of the evaluation object expression at each point in time in accordance with the ratio of the number of times that the evaluation object expression appears to the number of times that the related expression appears at each point in time.
7. The information analysis device according to claim 1, wherein
the credibility calculation section calculates the rate to which an author of the evaluation object expression is identical with authors of the related expressions, for the evaluation object expression and related expressions acquired from the plurality of electronic documents, and makes adjustments to the credibility of the evaluation object expression depending on the rate of how many calculated authors are identical.
8. The information analysis device according to claim 1, wherein
the credibility calculation section calculates the rate to which a source of the evaluation object expression is identical with sources of the related expressions, for the evaluation object expression and related expressions acquired from the plurality of electronic documents, and makes adjustments to the credibility of the evaluation object expression depending on the rate of how many calculated sources are identical.
9. A search system comprising:
the information analysis device claimed in claim 1;
a document search section that uses, as a search condition, a highly reliable expression output from the information analysis device to search a document containing the expression from a plurality of search object documents for; and
a document output section that outputs the document found by the document search section.
10. An information analysis method comprising:
accepting an evaluation object expression as input, the evaluation object expression being an linguistic expression to be evaluated, and generating a linguistic expression related to the evaluation object expression as a related expression; and
acquiring the evaluation object expression and the related expression from a plurality of electronic documents along with time information and calculating credibility concerning the meaning of the evaluation object expression at a specific point in time by comparing the number of times that the acquired evaluation object expression appears and the number of times that the acquired related expression appears at the same time point.
11. The information analysis method according to claim 10, wherein
the calculating of the credibility involves acquiring the evaluation object expression and the related expression from a plurality of electronic documents along with time information, and making adjustments to the credibility of the evaluation object expression at a specific point in time by comparing the trend of change in the number of times that the acquired evaluation object expression appears and the trend of change in the number of times that the acquired related expression appears at the same time point.
12. The information analysis method according to claim 11, wherein:
the calculating of the credibility involves, when an upward trend of the evaluation object expression and a downward trend of the related expression are observed at the same time point, raising the credibility of the evaluation object expression for a time when the upward trend of the evaluation object expression and the downward trend of the related expression are observed at the same time point or for a time point after the observed time; and
the calculating of the credibility involves, when a downward trend of the evaluation object expression and an upward trend of the related expression are observed at the same time point, decreasing the credibility of the evaluation object expression for a time when the downward trend of the evaluation object expression and the upward trend of the related expression are observed at the same time point or for a time point after the observed time.
13. The information analysis method according to claim 10, wherein
the generating of the related expression involves generating, as a related expression, an expression whose meaning is in conflict with the evaluation object expression.
14. The information analysis method according to claim 10, wherein
the generating of the related expression involves generating, as a related expression, an expression that is in co-occurrence with the evaluation object expression by referring to the plurality of electronic documents.
15. The information analysis method according to claim 14, wherein
the calculating of the credibility involves making adjustments to the credibility of the evaluation object expression at each point in time in accordance with the ratio of the number of times that the evaluation object expression appears to the number of times that the related expression appears at each point in time.
16. The information analysis method according to claim 10, wherein
the calculating of the credibility involves calculating the rate to which an author of the evaluation object expression is identical with authors of the related expressions, for the evaluation object expression and related expressions acquired from the plurality of electronic documents, amd making adjustments to the credibility of the evaluation object expression depending on the rate of how many calculated authors are identical.
17. The information analysis method according to claim 10, wherein
the calculating of the credibility involves calculating the rate to which a source of the evaluation object expression is identical with sources of the related expressions, for the evaluation object expression and related expressions acquired from the plurality of electronic documents, and making adjustments to the credibility of the evaluation object expression depending on the rate of how many calculated sources are identical.
18. An information analysis program for causing a computer to execute:
a related expression generation process of accepting an evaluation object expression as input, the evaluation object expression being an linguistic expression to be evaluated, and generating a linguistic expression related to the evaluation object expression as a related expression; and
a credibility calculation process of acquiring the evaluation object expression and the related expression from a plurality of electronic documents along with time information and calculating credibility concerning the meaning of the evaluation object expression at a specific point in time by comparing the number of times that the acquired evaluation object expression appears and the number of times that the acquired related expression appears at the same time point.
19. The information analysis program according to claim 18 for causing a computer to execute, in the credibility calculation process,
a process of acquiring the evaluation object expression and the related expression from a plurality of electronic documents along with time information and make adjustments to the credibility of the evaluation object expression at a specific point in time by comparing the trend of change in the number of times that the acquired evaluation object expression appears and the trend of change in the number of times that the acquired related expression appears at the same time point.
20. The information analysis program according to claim 19 for causing a computer to execute, in the credibility calculation process:
a process of raising, when an upward trend of the evaluation object expression and a downward trend of the related expression are observed at the same time point, the credibility of the evaluation object expression for a time when the upward trend of the evaluation object expression and the downward trend of the related expression are observed at the same time point or for a time point after the observed time; and
a process of decreasing, when a downward trend of the evaluation object expression and an upward trend of the related expression are observed at the same time point, the credibility of the evaluation object expression for a time when the downward trend of the evaluation object expression and the upward trend of the related expression are observed at the same time point or for a time point after the observed time.
21. The information analysis program according to claim 18 for causing a computer to execute, in the related expression generation process,
a process of generating, as a related expression, an expression whose meaning is in conflict with the evaluation object expression.
22. The information analysis program according to claim 18 for causing a computer to execute, in the related expression generation process,
a process of generating, as a related expression, an expression that is in co-occurrence with the evaluation object expression by referring to the plurality of electronic documents.
23. The information analysis program according to claim 22 for causing a computer to execute, in the credibility calculation process,
a process of making adjustments to the credibility of the evaluation object expression at each point in time in accordance with the ratio of the number of times that the evaluation object expression appears to the number of times that the related expression appears at each point in time.
24. The information analysis program according to claim 18 for causing a computer to execute, in the credibility calculation process,
a process of calculating the rate to which an author of the evaluation object expression is identical with authors of the related expressions, for the evaluation object expression and related expressions acquired from the plurality of electronic documents, and making adjustments to the credibility of the evaluation object expression depending on the rate of how many calculated authors are identical.
25. The information analysis program according to claim 18 for causing a computer to execute, in the credibility calculation process,
a process of calculating the rate to which a source of the evaluation object expression is identical with sources of the related expressions, for the evaluation object expression and related expressions acquired from the plurality of electronic documents, and making adjustments to the credibility of the evaluation object expression depending on the rate of how many calculated sources are identical.
The claims below are in addition to those above.
All refrences to claim(s) which appear below refer to the numbering after this setence.
1. A display system, comprising:
a standardized display driver to provide address voltages;
an array of interferometric elements; and
a voltage adjuster to adjust address voltages to provide adjusted row address voltages to the array of interferometric elements,
wherein the voltage adjuster further comprises a resistor divider network configured to lower the address voltage amplitudes that are provided by the standardized display driver.
2. The display system of claim 1, the standardized display driver further comprising a driver for a liquid crystal display.
3. The display system of claim 1, the may of interferometric elements further comprising an array of iMoD\u2122 elements.
4. The display system of claim 1, the voltage adjuster to adjust row address voltages.
5. The display system of claim 1, the voltage adjuster to adjust column address voltages.
6. A method of manufacturing an array of modulator elements and an adjuster circuit, comprising:
depositing a first metal layer on a transparent substrate;
patterning and etching the first metal layer to form electrodes;
depositing an optical stack layer;
depositing a first sacrificial layer upon the optical stack layer;
depositing a second metal layer on the sacrificial layer;
patterning and forming the second metal layer to form modulator elements;
forming a resistor divider network configured to lower address voltage amplitude that are provided from a standardized display driver; and
forming resistors from one metal layer and connecting the resistors with a subsequent metal layer.
7. The method of claim 6, forming the resistors from one metal layer further comprising forming the resistors from the first metal layer and connecting the resistors with the second metal layer.
8. The method of claim 6, further comprising:
depositing a second sacrificial layer;
depositing a third metal layer on the second sacrificial layer; and
patterning and etching the third metal layer to form posts and supports.
9. The method of manufacturing of claim 6, wherein the resistor divider network is formed on the first metal layer.
10. The method of claim 6 forming the resistors further comprising forming the resistors from the second metal layer and connecting the resistors using the third metal layer.
11. The method of claim 6, further comprising:
depositing a third sacrificial layer;
depositing a fourth metal layer on the third sacrificial layer;
patterning and etching the fourth metal layer to form a bus layer.
12. The method of claim 6, forming the resistors from one metal layer further comprising forming the resistors from the first metal layer and connecting the resistors using the fourth metal layer.
13. The method of claim 6, forming the resistors from one metal layer further comprising forming the resistors from the second metal layer and connecting the resistors using the fourth metal layer.
14. The method of claim 6, forming the resistors from one metal layer further comprising forming the resistors from the third metal layer and connecting the resistors using the fourth metal layer.
15. A resistor network, comprising:
an incoming address line;
a first resistor connected between the address line and a conductive bus; and
a second resistor connected between the address line and an adjusted address line,
wherein the resistor network lowers address voltage amplitudes provided by a
standardized display driver.
16. The resistor network of claim 15 the address line further comprising a row address line.
17. The resistor network of claim 15, the address line further comprising a column address line.
18. The method of manufacturing of claim 6, wherein the resistor divider network is formed on the same substrate of the array.
19. The method of claim 6, forming the resistors further comprising forming the resistors from the first metal layer and connecting the resistors using the third metal layer.
20. The method of manufacturing of claim 6, wherein the resistor divider network is formed on the second metal layer.