1. A fabric sleeve for protecting elongate members against at least one of EMI, RFI or ESD, comprising:
a wall extending along a longitudinal axis between opposite ends, said wall being formed from a plurality of filaments interlaced with one another, at least one of said filaments being provided as a continuous strand of conductive wire and at least one of said filaments being provided as a heat-fusible nonconductive filament, said continuous strand of conductive wire being at least partially embedded in fixed attachment with said at least one heat-fusible nonconductive filament at bond joints formed of melted and solidified material of said at least one heat-fusible nonconductive filament.
2. The fabric sleeve of claim 1 wherein said wall has opposite edges extending generally parallel to said longitudinal central axis and further comprising at least one heat-set filament biasing said opposite edges into overlapping relation with one another.
3. The fabric sleeve of claim 2 wherein said at least one heat-fusible nonconductive filament is a monofilament.
4. The fabric sleeve of claim 3 wherein said at least one heat-set filament is a monofilament.
5. The fabric sleeve of claim 4 wherein said at least one heat-fusible nonconductive monofilament and said at least one heat-set monofilament are provided as a bicomponent monofilament having an outer sheath of heat-fusible material having a first melt temperature, said outer sheath forming said at least one heat-fusible nonconductive filament, and an inner core of heat-settable material having a second melt temperature that is greater than said first melt temperature, said inner core forming said at least one heat-set filament.
6. The fabric sleeve of claim 5 wherein at least one of said at least one bicomponent monofilament extends circumferentially about said longitudinal axis.
7. The fabric sleeve of claim 2 wherein said wall is woven with warp yarn extending generally parallel to said longitudinal axis and weft yarn extending generally transverse to said longitudinal axis, at least one of said warp yarn and at least one of said weft yarn being provided as said continuous strand of conductive wire and at least one of said weft yarn being provided as said at least one heat-fusible nonconductive monofilament and at least one of said weft yarn being provided as said at least one heat-set monofilament.
8. The fabric sleeve of claim 7 wherein said at least one continuous strand of conductive wire is a hybrid filament including said at least one continuous strand of conductive wire twisted or served with a non-conductive multifilament.
9. The fabric sleeve of claim 1 wherein said plurality of filaments are braided with one another to form generally diamond-shaped openings bounded by said continuous strand of conductive wire, said generally diamond-shaped openings being fixed in size by said bond joints.
10. The fabric sleeve of claim 1 wherein said heat-fusible non-conductive filaments are multifilaments.
11. The fabric sleeve of claim 1 wherein said wall is seamless and circumferentially continuous about said longitudinal axis.
12. The fabric sleeve of claim 1 wherein said wall is knit.
13. A method of constructing a fabric sleeve for protecting elongate members against at least one of EMI, RFI or ESD, comprising:
forming a wall extending along a longitudinal axis between opposite ends by interlacing a plurality of filaments with one another and providing at least one of the filaments as a continuous strand of conductive wire and at least one of the filaments as a heat-fusible nonconductive filament; and
at least partially embedding said continuous strand of conductive wire in said heat-fusible nonconductive filament and fixing said continuous strand of conductive wire against relative movement with said heat-fusible nonconductive filament.
14. The method of claim 13 further including heat-fusing said heat-fusible nonconductive filament in bonded, fixed attachment with said continuous strand of conductive wire.
15. The method of claim 14 further including biasing opposite edges of the wall into overlapping relation with one another by heat-setting at least one of said plurality of filaments.
16. The method of claim 15 further including performing the heat-fusing and heat-setting in a simultaneous operation.
17. The method of claim 13 further including performing the interlacing in a weaving process.
18. The method of claim 17 further including weaving the continuous strand of wire in a warp direction extending generally parallel to the longitudinal axis and in a weft direction extending generally transverse to the longitudinal axis.
19. The method of claim 18 further including providing the heat-fusible nonconductive filament as a bicomponent monofilament having an outer sheath of heat-fusible material having a first melt temperature and an inner core of heat-settable material having a second melt temperature that is greater than said first melt temperature.
20. The method of claim 19 further including heat-fusing the outer sheath in bonded, fixed attachment with the continuous strand of conductive wire and biasing opposite edges of the wall into overlapping relation with one another by heat-setting the inner core.
21. The method of claim 20 further including providing the continuous strand of conductive wire as a hybrid filament including the at least one continuous strand of conductive wire twisted or served with a non-conductive multifilament.
22. The method of claim 13 further including providing the continuous strand of conductive wire as a hybrid filament including the at least one continuous strand of conductive wire twisted or served with a non-conductive multifilament.
23. The method of claim 13 further including performing the interlacing in a braiding process.
24. The method of claim 13 further including performing the interlacing in a knitting process.
The claims below are in addition to those above.
All refrences to claim(s) which appear below refer to the numbering after this setence.
1. A method for processing paper checks, comprising:
a) receiving at a third party payment processor computer at least one data file containing a plurality of transaction records, each transaction record including MICR information for one paper check used in a transaction and an amount for the transaction, the transaction records being received without an image file;
b) identifying a first portion of the transaction records associated with an indication of an end of a trial period;
c) identifying a second portion of the transaction records that are not associated with any end of trial period;
d) scanning said batch of checks thereby creating a digital image of the checks and, for each said check, associating said image with said check’s MICR information;
e) processing at the third party payment processor computer said check transactions according to type and associated trial period indicator according to all of the following rules:
i) ACH-eligible transactions found in the first portion that are beyond the trial period are submitted to the ACH network for settlement without first being submitted to a matching protocol that searches for image files that match data files;
ii) ACH-ineligible transactions found in the first portion that are beyond the trial period are submitted to the matching protocol to match image files to data files before being submitted for settlement;
iii) ACH-eligible transactions found in the first portion that are not beyond the trial period are submitted to the matching protocol to match image files to data files before being submitted for settlement;
iv) ACH-ineligible transactions found in the first portion that are not beyond the trial period are submitted to the matching protocol to match image files to data files before being submitted for settlement;
v) ACH-ineligible transaction records found in the second portion are submitted to the matching protocol to match image files to data files before being submitted for settlement; and
vi) ACH-eligible transaction records found in the second portion are submitted to the ACH network for settlement without first being submitted to the matching protocol to match image files to data files.
2. A system for processing paper checks, comprising:
a) means for receiving at a third party payment processor computer a MICR file containing data captured by a merchant, said MICR file representing purchase transactions made by check, said MICR file including a transaction amount associated with MICR information;
b) means for associating each transaction record in a first portion of transaction records with an indication of the end of a trial period while not associating transaction records in a second portion of the transaction records with an end of trial period;
c) means for creating a digital image of the check;
d) means for associating said image with said check’s MICR information;
e) means for processing said check transactions at the third party payment processor computer according to type and associated trial period indicator according to all of the following rules:
i) ACH-eligible transactions found in the first portion that are beyond the trial period are submitted to the ACH network for settlement without first being submitted to a matching protocol that searches for image files that match data files;
ii) ACH-ineligible transactions found in the first portion that are beyond the trial period are submitted to the matching protocol to match image files to data files before being submitted for settlement;
iii) ACH-eligible transactions found in the first portion that are not beyond the trial period are submitted to the matching protocol to match image files to data files before being submitted for settlement;
iv) ACH-ineligible transactions found in the first portion that are not beyond the trial period are submitted to the matching protocol to match image files to data files before being submitted for settlement;
v) ACH-ineligible transaction records found in the second portion are submitted to the matching protocol to match image files to data files before being submitted for settlement; and
vi) ACH-eligible transaction records found in the second portion are submitted to the ACH network for settlement without first being submitted to the matching protocol to match image files to data files.
3. A method for processing paper checks, comprising the steps of:
a) capturing, using a point of sale device, an amount of a transaction and associating that amount in a transaction record with MICR information for each paper check;
b) sending a transaction data file containing a plurality of said transaction records to a third party payment processor computer, the transaction data file being without images of the paper checks;
c) associating a store identifier with each transaction record;
d) establishing a list of participating stores;
e) scanning said paper checks thereby creating a digital image of the paper checks and, for each said paper check, associating said digital image with said check’s MICR information in an image record;
f) determining at the third party payment processor computer whether each transaction record is a participating store transaction record or a non-participating store transaction record by examining if the store identifier associated with each transaction record matches an entry on the list of stores;
g) for participating store transaction records,
i) processing the ACH-ineligible transactions by comparing said image records with said transaction records to find matches, and
ii) processing the ACH-eligible transactions by submitting to the ACH network for settlement without first comparing image files with data files; and
h) for non-participating store transaction records, not processing the transactions for payment.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the step of associating a store identifier with each transaction record further comprises inserting a store number into each transaction record.
5. The method of claim 3, wherein a plurality of store identifiers are assigned to a single merchant, further wherein a first set of the plurality of store identifiers assigned to the single merchant are found in the list of participating stores and wherein a second set of the plurality of store identifiers assigned to the single merchant are not found in the list of participating stores.
6. A method for processing paper checks, comprising:
a) receiving, at a third party payment processor computer, at least one transaction data file containing a plurality of transaction records with each transaction record containing an amount of a transaction that used a paper check and MICR information extracted from the paper check;
b) associating, at the third party payment processor computer, a first portion of the transaction records with an indication of an end of a trial period;
c) receiving, at the third party payment processor computer, a check image file containing
i) a plurality of digital check images generated by scanning the paper checks, and
ii) MICR information associated with each of the digital check images;
d) determining, at the third party payment processor computer, whether each transaction record is ACH-eligible or ACH-ineligible;
e) submitting, from the third party payment processor computer, ACH-ineligible transaction records and ACH-eligible transaction records that are not beyond the trial period to a matching protocol that matches the MICR information in a submitted transaction record to matching MICR information associated with a matched digital check image found in the check image file; and
f) submitting, from the third party payment processor computer, ACH-eligible transaction records that are beyond the trial period to the ACH network for settlement without submission to the matching protocol;
wherein a second portion of the transaction records are not associated with any end of trial period, wherein ACH-ineligible transaction records found in the second portion are submitted to the matching protocol and further wherein ACH-eligible transaction records found in the second portion are submitted to the ACH network for settlement without submission to the matching protocol.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the step of associating, at the third party payment processor computer, a first portion of the transaction records with an indication of the end of the trial period further comprises reading a date stored in the transaction record.
8. The method of claim 6, wherein the step of associating, at the third party payment processor computer, a first portion of the transaction records with an indication of the end of the trial period further comprises identifying a store identifier for each transaction records and further identifying the end of trial period that is associated with the identified store identifier.
9. The method of claim 6, wherein the step of associating, at the third party payment processor computer, a first portion of the transaction records with an indication of the end of the trial period further comprises identifying a merchant identifier for each transaction records and further identifying the end of trial period that is associated with the identified merchant identifier.