1. A disposable lawn bag designed for easy removal of leaves and other law debris comprising:
a flexible garbage bag, said bag having a closed end and an open end, one or more stakes for supporting said open end of said bag in an open portion, such that when said stakes are spread apart tautly and the ends of said stakes are inserted into the ground, said bag is flush to the ground and its open end is held open for ease in raking leave and lawn debris into said bag.
2. The disposable bag described in claim 1 wherein:
said bag is made of various thickness of disposable plastic material and is in a variety of sizes depending on the job it is being used for.
3. The disposable bag described in claim 1 wherein:
each said bag includes a slot on opposite borders of its opening which allows for support stakes to be held, when the ends of said stakes are spread apart tautly and inserted into the ground, said bag will be held o pen and sit flush against the ground.
4. The disposable bag described in claim 1 wherein:
said stakes can be made out of a variety of materials including, plastic, wood, metal, cardboard, aluminum, rubber and paper.
5. The disposable bag described in claim 1 wherein:
said stakes are straight, hinged, collapsible or telescopic.
6. A disposable bag described in claim 1 wherein:
said bag has an enclosed stake, said stake can form a U-shape when the two ends of said stake are inserted into the ground to hold said bag flush to the ground and in an open position for ease in raking leave and law debris.
7. A disposable bag described in claim 1 wherein:
said opening of said bag is in the form of a square, rectangular, or trapezoidal shape when the two ends of said stakes are inserted into the ground, and will hold the bag flush to the ground and open for ease in raking leaves and lawn debris.
8. A disposable bag described in claim 1 wherein:
said flexible gag has one or more enclosed stakes to form a triangular shape when the two ends of said stakes are inserted into the ground to hold the bag flush to the ground and open for ease in raking leaves and lawn debris.
The claims below are in addition to those above.
All refrences to claim(s) which appear below refer to the numbering after this setence.
1. A device layout tool, comprising:
a diffusion layer, wherein the diffusion layer is configured to define diffusion structures;
a gate electrode layer, wherein the gate electrode layer is configured to define gate electrode structures, wherein the gate electrode layer is over the diffusion layer, wherein the gate electrode layer and the diffusion layer are configured to define a three dimensional (3D) gate structure covering a fin structure, wherein the fin structure has three exposed surfaces; and
three defect-describing layers, wherein each of the three defect-describing layers is configured to define locations of gate defects relative to one of the three exposed surfaces of the fin structure,
wherein the device layout tool is part of a fault modeling tool, and wherein the three defect-describing layers are configured to defined a location of defects for fault injection.
2. The device layout tool of claim 1, wherein the three defect-describing layers are configured to define the location of gate defects relative to the three exposed surfaces of the fin structure.
3. The device layout tool of claim 1, wherein the gate defects are selected from the group consisting of opens, point defects, or a combination thereof.
4. The device layout tool of claim 1, wherein each of the three defect-describing layers is configured to use coordinates to define the location and size of a defect.
5. The device layout tool of claim 1, wherein each of the three defect-describing layers is configured to use ratios representing a relative location of a defect to a width and a length of the gate electrode layer associated with the one of the three exposed surfaces of the fin structure corresponding to the defect-describing layer to represent the location of the defect.
6. The device layout tool of claim 5, wherein the location if the defect is close to an edge of the fin structure the values of the ratios are close to 0 or 1.
7. The device layout tool of claim 1, wherein two exposed surfaces of the three exposed surfaces of the fin are substantially perpendicular to a third exposed surface of the three exposed surfaces.
8. A device layout tool, comprising:
a diffusion layer, wherein the diffusion layer is configured to define diffusion structures;
a gate electrode layer, wherein the gate electrode layer is configured to define gate electrode structures, wherein the gate electrode layer is over the diffusion layer, wherein the gate electrode layer and the diffusion layer are configured to define a three dimensional (3D) gate structure covering a fin structure, wherein the fin structure has three exposed surfaces; and
a defect-describing layer, wherein the defect-describing layer is configured to define locations of gate defects relative to the three exposed surfaces of the fin structure.
9. The device layout tool of claim 8, wherein the defect-describing layer includes coordinate information of the gate defects, the coordinate information reflects which of the three exposed surfaces the gate defects are associated with.
10. The device layout tool of claim 8, wherein the gate defects are selected from the group consisting of opens, point defects, or a combination thereof.
11. The device layout tool of claim 9, wherein an effective width of the fin structure is configured to define the locations of the gate defects, and wherein the effective width of the fin structure is equal to a width of the fin structure plus two times a height of the fin structure.
12. The device layout tool of claim 11, wherein the device layout too is configured to determine an exposed surface of the three exposed surfaces associated with a particular defect based on a coordinate of a particular defect being in a particular range.
13. The device layout tool of claim 8, wherein the defect-describing layer is configured to use ratios representing a relative location of a defect to an effective width and a length of the fin structure to represent the location and an associated exposed surface of the defect, wherein the effective width is equal to a width of the fin structure plus two times a height of the fin structure.
14. The device layout tool of claim 8, wherein the device layout tool is part of a fault modeling tool, and wherein the three defect-describing layers are configured to defined a location of defects for fault injection.
15. A method of fault simulation, comprising:
providing geometric description and device property parameters of transistors, wherein the transistors include fin field-effect transistors (finFETs);
providing geometric description of injected faults, wherein the injected faults are described by one or more defect-describing layers, wherein the one of more defect-describing layers are used to define locations of gate defects relative to three exposed surfaces of a three-dimensional (3D) fin structure;
providing test vectors, test parameters and test devices; and
performing a device simulation, using a device tool, to generate simulation results with injected faults, wherein the device layout tool is part of a fault modeling tool, and wherein the one or more defect-describing layers are configured to defined a location of defects for fault injection.
16. The method of fault simulation of claim 15, further comprising:
performing device simulation to generate simulation results without an injected fault; and
comparing the simulation results without the injected fault with the simulation results with injected faults to identify detectable faults.
17. The method of fault simulation of claim 16, further comprising:
storing the identified detectable faults, associated test vectors, associated test devices, and associated simulation results in a database.
18. The method of fault simulation of claim 16, further comprising:
providing new faults for new fault injection for fault simulation.
19. The method of fault simulation of claim 16, further comprising:
providing new test vectors, new test parameters, and new test devices for additional fault simulation.
20. The method of claim 15, wherein providing the geometric description of injected faults comprises using a single defect-describing layer, and the single defect-describing layer is used to define the locations of the gate defects for all three exposed surfaces of the 3D fin structure.