1. Agent for treating keratin-containing fibers, comprising in a cosmetically acceptable carrier:
(a) acrylatebeheneth 25-methacrylate cross polymer present in an amount of 0.1 wt. % to 5.0 wt. %, based on total weight of the agent and
b) acrylatepalmeth-25-acrylate copolymer present in an amount of 0.1 wt. % to 5.0 wt. %, based on total weight of the agent.
2. Agent according to claim 1 further comprising a film-forming andor setting polymer.
3. Agent according to claim 2, wherein the film-forming andor setting polymer is chosen from at least one cationic polymer having at least one structural unit according to Formula (M11-a) and at least one structural unit according to Formula (M6) and at least one structural unit according to Formula (M8) and at least one structural unit according to Formula (M12)
4. Agent according to claim 2, wherein the film-forming andor setting polymer is present in an amount of 0.01 wt. % to 20 wt. %, based on total weight of the agent.
5. Agent according to claim 1 further comprising at least one alkanolamine.
6. Method for treating keratin-containing fibers comprising applying an agent according to claim 1 onto the keratin-containing fibers.
The claims below are in addition to those above.
All refrences to claim(s) which appear below refer to the numbering after this setence.
1. A non-transitory computer-readable medium encoded with a computer program for optimizing a technical system that is a nonlinear technical product or process, the program when executed by a computer causes the computer to perform a method comprising:
describing the technical system by stochastic system output target values dependent on stochastic system input parameter values, thereby stating discrete technical system dependencies;
using Response Surface Methods based on the discrete technical system dependencies to generate at least one continuous auxiliary function {tilde over (\u0192)}i(); {tilde over (g)}i()) for real dependencies of target values on the input parameter values (y=f(); z=g());
using an auxiliary function ({tilde over (\u0192)}i(); {tilde over (g)}i()) to generate at least one optimizing parameter (E({tilde over (\u0192)}i()); Var({tilde over (\u0192)}i()); P({tilde over (g)}i())) optimized by an objective function, thereby generating an additional discrete technical system dependence ({tilde over (\u0192)}i(i); {tilde over (g)}i(i)); and
repeating both of said using operations to adaptively optimize the technical system, respectively additionally using the additional discrete technical system dependence ({tilde over (\u0192)}i(i); {tilde over (g)}i(i)), until a difference of successive optimized optimizing parameters (|E({tilde over (\u0192)}i(i)\u2212E(\u0192i+1(i+1)|; |Var({tilde over (\u0192)}i()\u2212Var({tilde over (\u0192)}i+1()|; |P({tilde over (g)}i())\u2212P({tilde over (g)}i+1())|) is as low as desired and a final additional discrete technical system dependence ({tilde over (\u0192)}p(); {tilde over (g)}p()) is useable as an optimal technical system operating point,
wherein the optimizing parameter includes at least one of a mean value (E({tilde over (\u0192)}())) determined by E({tilde over (\u0192)}())=\u222bn({tilde over (\u0192)}()\u03c1()d), and a variance (Var({tilde over (\u0192)}())) determined by Var(y)=\u222bn({tilde over (\u0192)}()\u2212E({tilde over (\u0192)}()))2\u03c1()d, where \u03c1() is a probabilistic density function of an input parameter distribution.
2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the objective function is provided by minimizing or maximizing the mean value (E({tilde over (\u0192)}())) andor minimizing of the variance (Var({tilde over (\u0192)}())).
3. A method according to claim 2, wherein the objective function is alternatively or cumulatively provided by maximizing optimizing parameters which are input parameter tolerances
(
max
\u03c3
i
,
\u2062
j
=
1
,
\u2026
,
n
\u2062
\u2211
i
=
l
n
\u2062
\u03c3
i
)
and taking into account at least one constraint (P({tilde over (g)}()\u22660)).
4. A method according to claim 2, wherein the objective function is alternatively or cumulatively provided by keeping an optimizing parameter which is a failure probability (P({tilde over (g)}()\u22660)) of at least one of another value, and the target value (P({tilde over (\u0192)}()\u22660)), under or equal to a prescribed probability tolerance, with P({tilde over (g)}()\u22660)=\u222b{tilde over (g)}()\u22660\u03c1()d and with \u03c1() a probabilistic density function of the input parameter distribution.
5. A method according to claim 2, wherein the objective function is alternatively or cumulatively provided by minimizing a failure probability (P({tilde over (g)}()\u22660)) of at least one of another value and the target value (P({tilde over (\u0192)}()\u22660)) with P({tilde over (g)}()\u22660)=\u222b{tilde over (g)}()\u22660 \u03c1()d and with \u03c1() a probabilistic density function of the input parameter distribution.
6. A method according to claim 5, wherein for mixed stochastic input parameters () and deterministic input parameters (D) a constraint depends on the deterministic input parameters (h(D)\u22660).
7. A method according to claim 6, wherein the objective is provided by using stochastic sensitivities of the optimizing parameters (E({tilde over (\u0192)}()); Var({tilde over (\u0192)}()); P({tilde over (g)}())).
8. A method according to claim 7, wherein normal distributed input parameters () form the probabilistic density function:
\u03c1
\u2061
(
x
\u03c1
)
=
Det
\u2062
\u2062
\u03a3
(
2
\u2062
\u03c0
)
n
\u2062
exp
\u2061
(
–
1
2
\u2062
(
x
\u03c1
–
\u03bc
\u03c1
)
T
\u2062
\u03a3
–
1
\u2061
(
x
\u03c1
–
\u03bc
\u03c1
)
)
andor beta distributed input parameters () comprise the probabilistic density function:
\u03c1
\u2061
(
x
\u03c1
)
=
\u220f
i
=
1
n
\u2062
\u2062
\u0393
\u2061
(
\u03b1
i
+
\u03b2
i
)
\u0393
\u2061
(
\u03b1
i
)
\u2062
\u0393\u03b2
i
\u2062
x
i
\u03b1
\u2062
\u2062
i
–
1
\u2061
(
1
–
x
i
)
\u03b2
i
–
1
.
9. A method according to claim 8, wherein the objective function is provided by additionally or cumulatively using the cumulative density function (\u222bn({tilde over (\u0192)}()d)) of the technical system response.
10. A method according to claim 9, further comprising generating the auxiliary function ({tilde over (\u0192)}(); {tilde over (g)}()) on based on discrete input parameter values (i) and discrete target values (yi=f()).
11. A method according to claim 10, wherein concerning changes of the input parameters depending on time (\u0394(t)) the input parameters () satisfy common stochastical differential equations, whose density development is described by the Fokker-Plank equation.
12. A method according to claim 11, wherein the Response Surface Methods are at least on of a Hermite, Laguerre, Legendre and Jacobi approximation.